Joint media release: Consumer groups fear small debts could lead to big problems for Australian consumers

This is a joint media release from Financial Counselling Australia, Australian Privacy Foundation, Australian Communication Consumer Action Network, Consumer Credit Legal Centre NSW and Consumer Action Law Centre. 

A coalition of consumer groups is urging the Federal Government to reconsider aspects of its planned credit reporting reform which could see Australians have their credit history tarnished for late payment of amounts as little as $100. In a recent discussion paper on credit reporting regulations, the Government proposed not to increase the minimum debt that can be listed on a credit report beyond $100.[i]

The consumer groups believe the minimum amount for which consumers should have their credit history marked should be increased to $500—and both the Energy and Water Ombudsman NSW[ii] and the Senate Legal and Constitutional Affairs Legislation Committee[iii] have proposed the amount be increased to $300.

Spokesperson Kat Lane of Consumer Credit Legal Centre, said ‘under the current proposal someone’s ability to access a home loan could be ruined by one overdue electricity or phone bill.’

‘It’s easy to fall 60 days behind on an energy bill—it could be something as simple as the bill being sent to the wrong address or the account holder being away from home for an extended period. I don’t think many people would think this should affect someone’s ability to get a home loan,’ said Ms Lane.

‘If the amount for which someone could have a default listed on their credit report was increased to $500, people would be far less likely to be overly penalised for one overdue bill or for making one simple mistake.’

Ms Lane said many small debts listed on credit reports were utility or phone debts and didn’t necessarily reflect a person’s suitability for credit. She also said that smaller debts, such as phone or utility debts, are often disputed by consumers.

‘We’d hate to see someone’s credit history affected because of an outstanding bill which they don’t even owe. Billing mistakes do happen and, as the Government’s plan currently stands, these small mistakes could have big consequences.’

The advocates also issued a warning about the Government’s planned introduction of ‘comprehensive credit reporting’ which will give businesses access to much more detail about someone’s financial history.

‘Australians will soon have their credit history and repayment habits recorded in greater detail. Government and industry tell us this will lead to more responsible lending, and while this information could assist with credit decisions, it’s also likely to be used by credit providers to push more credit.

‘If comprehensive credit reporting is introduced, Government and industry needs to make efforts to explain the new regime to consumers, especially that repayment information such as whether you repay your loans on time each month will be now listed on credit reports, and consumers’ rights to make complaints if there are disputes,’ said Ms Lane.

END

Media contact:
Kat Lane – Consumer Credit Legal Centre NSW – 0447 620 694
Dan Simpson – Consumer Action Law Centre – 0413 299 567

 


[i] Australian Government Attorney-General’s Department, Discussion Paper: Proposed regulations under the Privacy Amendment (Enhancing Privacy Protection) Bill, August 2012.

[ii] Energy and Water Ombudsman NSW (24 March 2011) submission to Senate Finance and Public Administration Committee, p 7.

[iii] Inquiry into the Privacy Amendment (Enhancing Privacy Protection) Bill 2012 [provisions], paragraph 6.56.

Print Friendly, PDF & Email

Skip to content